When a public employee or agency uses social media to inform the public about government work, solicits public comments about government issues, and identifies the media with the government, then the media is being used for government purposes. In those situations, members of the public have the right to access the material and to make their views known—including views that express disagreement or criticism. If a public official is using a social media account as a government actor and blocks critics or reporters from seeing what that account has to say, they are most likely running afoul of the Constitution. The right to criticize the government is the heart of the First Amendment, and courts have recognized that blocking people from government social media accounts as infringing on that right. The First Amendment is clear. Government actors and agencies cannot and should not censor people for disagreeing with them, whether that is at a town meeting, on a public sidewalk, or online. Creating a process that requires state agencies to hold a hearing prior to blocking or reporting an individual group still allows for government actors and agencies to censor people for disagreeing with them.
HB 6385, An Act Concerning State Agency Complaints Regarding Individuals or Groups to Social Media Platforms
Session
2023
Bill number
HB 6385
Position
Oppose
Related content

ACLU of Connecticut Statement on AI Caucus and AI Legislation
March 27, 2025
ACLU of Connecticut Sends Rejoinder to Suffield Library About Book...
March 20, 2025
S.B. 1356: An Act Concerning Data Privacy, Online Monitoring,...
February 24, 2025
S.B. 2: An Act Concerning Artificial Intelligence
February 24, 2025
ACLU of Connecticut Strategic Plan 2025-2028
January 31, 2025
Know Your Rights: K-12 Public School Student Protests
January 27, 2025
Know Your Rights: Free Speech
January 27, 2025